|
@@ -232,26 +232,6 @@ public class TestDFSHAAdminMiniCluster {
|
|
|
assertFalse("Both namenodes cannot be active", nn1.isActiveState()
|
|
|
&& nn2.isActiveState());
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* This test case doesn't allow nn2 to transition to Active even with
|
|
|
- forceActive switch since nn1 is already active */
|
|
|
- if(nn1.getState() != null && !nn1.getState().
|
|
|
- equals(HAServiceState.STANDBY.name()) ) {
|
|
|
- cluster.transitionToStandby(0);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- if(nn2.getState() != null && !nn2.getState().
|
|
|
- equals(HAServiceState.STANDBY.name()) ) {
|
|
|
- cluster.transitionToStandby(1);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- //Making sure both the namenode are in standby state
|
|
|
- assertTrue(nn1.isStandbyState());
|
|
|
- assertTrue(nn2.isStandbyState());
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- runTool("-transitionToActive", "nn1");
|
|
|
- runTool("-transitionToActive", "nn2","--forceactive");
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- assertFalse("Both namenodes cannot be active even though with forceActive",
|
|
|
- nn1.isActiveState() && nn2.isActiveState());
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
/* In this test case, we have deliberately shut down nn1 and this will
|
|
|
cause HAAAdmin#isOtherTargetNodeActive to throw an Exception
|
|
|
and transitionToActive for nn2 with forceActive switch will succeed
|