|
@@ -34,14 +34,23 @@ import org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException;
|
|
|
import org.apache.zookeeper.ZooKeeper;
|
|
|
import org.apache.zookeeper.data.Stat;
|
|
|
import org.apache.zookeeper.server.auth.DigestAuthenticationProvider;
|
|
|
+import org.junit.After;
|
|
|
import org.junit.Before;
|
|
|
+import org.junit.Rule;
|
|
|
import org.junit.Test;
|
|
|
+import org.junit.rules.Timeout;
|
|
|
import org.mockito.Mockito;
|
|
|
|
|
|
public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
private Configuration conf;
|
|
|
private MiniZKFCCluster cluster;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /**
|
|
|
+ * Set the timeout for every test
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ @Rule
|
|
|
+ public Timeout testTimeout = new Timeout(3 * 60 * 1000);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
// Set up ZK digest-based credentials for the purposes of the tests,
|
|
|
// to make sure all of our functionality works with auth and ACLs
|
|
|
// present.
|
|
@@ -74,11 +83,21 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
this.cluster = new MiniZKFCCluster(conf, getServer(serverFactory));
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ @After
|
|
|
+ public void teardown() {
|
|
|
+ if (cluster != null) {
|
|
|
+ try {
|
|
|
+ cluster.stop();
|
|
|
+ } catch (Exception e) {
|
|
|
+ LOG.warn("When stopping the cluster", e);
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
* Test that the various command lines for formatting the ZK directory
|
|
|
* function correctly.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testFormatZK() throws Exception {
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
// Run without formatting the base dir,
|
|
@@ -101,14 +120,14 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* Test that if ZooKeeper is not running, the correct error
|
|
|
* code is returned.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testNoZK() throws Exception {
|
|
|
stopServer();
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
assertEquals(ZKFailoverController.ERR_CODE_NO_ZK,
|
|
|
runFC(svc));
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
@Test
|
|
|
public void testFormatOneClusterLeavesOtherClustersAlone() throws Exception {
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
@@ -146,7 +165,7 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* Test that automatic failover won't run against a target that hasn't
|
|
|
* explicitly enabled the feature.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=10000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testWontRunWhenAutoFailoverDisabled() throws Exception {
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
svc = Mockito.spy(svc);
|
|
@@ -162,7 +181,7 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* Test that, if ACLs are specified in the configuration, that
|
|
|
* it sets the ACLs when formatting the parent node.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testFormatSetsAcls() throws Exception {
|
|
|
// Format the base dir, should succeed
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
@@ -184,7 +203,7 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* Test that the ZKFC won't run if fencing is not configured for the
|
|
|
* local service.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testFencingMustBeConfigured() throws Exception {
|
|
|
DummyHAService svc = Mockito.spy(cluster.getService(0));
|
|
|
Mockito.doThrow(new BadFencingConfigurationException("no fencing"))
|
|
@@ -202,31 +221,27 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* transition is used when possible, falling back to fencing when
|
|
|
* the graceful approach fails.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testAutoFailoverOnBadHealth() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
- DummyHAService svc1 = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Faking svc0 unhealthy, should failover to svc1");
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Waiting for svc0 to enter initializing state");
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Allowing svc0 to be healthy again, making svc1 unreachable " +
|
|
|
- "and fail to gracefully go to standby");
|
|
|
- cluster.setUnreachable(1, true);
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Should fail back to svc0 at this point
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- // and fence svc1
|
|
|
- Mockito.verify(svc1.fencer).fence(Mockito.same(svc1));
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ DummyHAService svc1 = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Faking svc0 unhealthy, should failover to svc1");
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Waiting for svc0 to enter initializing state");
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Allowing svc0 to be healthy again, making svc1 unreachable " +
|
|
|
+ "and fail to gracefully go to standby");
|
|
|
+ cluster.setUnreachable(1, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Should fail back to svc0 at this point
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ // and fence svc1
|
|
|
+ Mockito.verify(svc1.fencer).fence(Mockito.same(svc1));
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
@@ -235,120 +250,104 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* transition is used when possible, falling back to fencing when
|
|
|
* the graceful approach fails.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testAutoFailoverOnBadState() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
- DummyHAService svc0 = cluster.getService(0);
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Faking svc0 to change the state, should failover to svc1");
|
|
|
- svc0.state = HAServiceState.STANDBY;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Should fail back to svc0 at this point
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ DummyHAService svc0 = cluster.getService(0);
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Faking svc0 to change the state, should failover to svc1");
|
|
|
+ svc0.state = HAServiceState.STANDBY;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Should fail back to svc0 at this point
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testAutoFailoverOnLostZKSession() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Expire svc0, it should fail over to svc1
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Expire svc1, it should fail back to svc0
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("======= Running test cases second time to test " +
|
|
|
- "re-establishment =========");
|
|
|
- // Expire svc0, it should fail over to svc1
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Expire svc1, it should fail back to svc0
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Expire svc0, it should fail over to svc1
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Expire svc1, it should fail back to svc0
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("======= Running test cases second time to test " +
|
|
|
+ "re-establishment =========");
|
|
|
+ // Expire svc0, it should fail over to svc1
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Expire svc1, it should fail back to svc0
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
* Test that, if the standby node is unhealthy, it doesn't try to become
|
|
|
* active
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testDontFailoverToUnhealthyNode() throws Exception {
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Make svc1 unhealthy, and wait for its FC to notice the bad health.
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(1, false);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHealthState(1, HealthMonitor.State.SERVICE_UNHEALTHY);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Expire svc0
|
|
|
+ cluster.getElector(0).preventSessionReestablishmentForTests();
|
|
|
try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Make svc1 unhealthy, and wait for its FC to notice the bad health.
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(1, false);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHealthState(1, HealthMonitor.State.SERVICE_UNHEALTHY);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Expire svc0
|
|
|
- cluster.getElector(0).preventSessionReestablishmentForTests();
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.expireActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Expired svc0's ZK session. Waiting a second to give svc1" +
|
|
|
- " a chance to take the lock, if it is ever going to.");
|
|
|
- Thread.sleep(1000);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ensure that no one holds the lock.
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(null);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Allowing svc0's elector to re-establish its connection");
|
|
|
- cluster.getElector(0).allowSessionReestablishmentForTests();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- // svc0 should get the lock again
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Expired svc0's ZK session. Waiting a second to give svc1" +
|
|
|
+ " a chance to take the lock, if it is ever going to.");
|
|
|
+ Thread.sleep(1000);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Ensure that no one holds the lock.
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(null);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
} finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Allowing svc0's elector to re-establish its connection");
|
|
|
+ cluster.getElector(0).allowSessionReestablishmentForTests();
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
+ // svc0 should get the lock again
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
* Test that the ZKFC successfully quits the election when it fails to
|
|
|
* become active. This allows the old node to successfully fail back.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testBecomingActiveFails() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
- DummyHAService svc1 = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Making svc1 fail to become active");
|
|
|
- cluster.setFailToBecomeActive(1, true);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Faking svc0 unhealthy, should NOT successfully " +
|
|
|
- "failover to svc1");
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHealthState(0, State.SERVICE_UNHEALTHY);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(null);
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ DummyHAService svc1 = cluster.getService(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- Mockito.verify(svc1.proxy, Mockito.timeout(2000).atLeastOnce())
|
|
|
- .transitionToActive(Mockito.<StateChangeRequestInfo>any());
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Faking svc0 healthy again, should go back to svc0");
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ensure that we can fail back to svc1 once it it is able
|
|
|
- // to become active (e.g the admin has restarted it)
|
|
|
- LOG.info("Allowing svc1 to become active, expiring svc0");
|
|
|
- svc1.failToBecomeActive = false;
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Making svc1 fail to become active");
|
|
|
+ cluster.setFailToBecomeActive(1, true);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Faking svc0 unhealthy, should NOT successfully " +
|
|
|
+ "failover to svc1");
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHealthState(0, State.SERVICE_UNHEALTHY);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(null);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Mockito.verify(svc1.proxy, Mockito.timeout(2000).atLeastOnce())
|
|
|
+ .transitionToActive(Mockito.<StateChangeRequestInfo>any());
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Faking svc0 healthy again, should go back to svc0");
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Ensure that we can fail back to svc1 once it it is able
|
|
|
+ // to become active (e.g the admin has restarted it)
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("Allowing svc1 to become active, expiring svc0");
|
|
|
+ svc1.failToBecomeActive = false;
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
@@ -356,211 +355,183 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* current state, without triggering any failovers, and without
|
|
|
* causing the active node to enter standby state.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testZooKeeperFailure() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Record initial ZK sessions
|
|
|
- long session0 = cluster.getElector(0).getZKSessionIdForTests();
|
|
|
- long session1 = cluster.getElector(1).getZKSessionIdForTests();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Stopping ZK server");
|
|
|
- stopServer();
|
|
|
- waitForServerDown(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Waiting for services to enter NEUTRAL mode");
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(0,
|
|
|
- ActiveStandbyElector.State.NEUTRAL);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(1,
|
|
|
- ActiveStandbyElector.State.NEUTRAL);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Checking that the services didn't change HA state");
|
|
|
- assertEquals(HAServiceState.ACTIVE, cluster.getService(0).state);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(HAServiceState.STANDBY, cluster.getService(1).state);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Restarting server");
|
|
|
- startServer();
|
|
|
- waitForServerUp(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Nodes should go back to their original states, since they re-obtain
|
|
|
- // the same sessions.
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(0, ActiveStandbyElector.State.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(1, ActiveStandbyElector.State.STANDBY);
|
|
|
- // Check HA states didn't change.
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Check they re-used the same sessions and didn't spuriously reconnect
|
|
|
- assertEquals(session0,
|
|
|
- cluster.getElector(0).getZKSessionIdForTests());
|
|
|
- assertEquals(session1,
|
|
|
- cluster.getElector(1).getZKSessionIdForTests());
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Record initial ZK sessions
|
|
|
+ long session0 = cluster.getElector(0).getZKSessionIdForTests();
|
|
|
+ long session1 = cluster.getElector(1).getZKSessionIdForTests();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Stopping ZK server");
|
|
|
+ stopServer();
|
|
|
+ waitForServerDown(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Waiting for services to enter NEUTRAL mode");
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(0,
|
|
|
+ ActiveStandbyElector.State.NEUTRAL);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(1,
|
|
|
+ ActiveStandbyElector.State.NEUTRAL);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Checking that the services didn't change HA state");
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(HAServiceState.ACTIVE, cluster.getService(0).state);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(HAServiceState.STANDBY, cluster.getService(1).state);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Restarting server");
|
|
|
+ startServer();
|
|
|
+ waitForServerUp(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Nodes should go back to their original states, since they re-obtain
|
|
|
+ // the same sessions.
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(0, ActiveStandbyElector.State.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(1, ActiveStandbyElector.State.STANDBY);
|
|
|
+ // Check HA states didn't change.
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.STANDBY);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Check they re-used the same sessions and didn't spuriously reconnect
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(session0,
|
|
|
+ cluster.getElector(0).getZKSessionIdForTests());
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(session1,
|
|
|
+ cluster.getElector(1).getZKSessionIdForTests());
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
* Test that the ZKFC can gracefully cede its active status.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testCedeActive() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
- DummyZKFC zkfc = cluster.getZkfc(0);
|
|
|
- // It should be in active to start.
|
|
|
- assertEquals(ActiveStandbyElector.State.ACTIVE,
|
|
|
- zkfc.getElectorForTests().getStateForTests());
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ask it to cede active for 3 seconds. It should respond promptly
|
|
|
- // (i.e. the RPC itself should not take 3 seconds!)
|
|
|
- ZKFCProtocol proxy = zkfc.getLocalTarget().getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000);
|
|
|
- long st = Time.now();
|
|
|
- proxy.cedeActive(3000);
|
|
|
- long et = Time.now();
|
|
|
- assertTrue("RPC to cedeActive took " + (et - st) + " ms",
|
|
|
- et - st < 1000);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Should be in "INIT" state since it's not in the election
|
|
|
- // at this point.
|
|
|
- assertEquals(ActiveStandbyElector.State.INIT,
|
|
|
- zkfc.getElectorForTests().getStateForTests());
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // After the prescribed 3 seconds, should go into STANDBY state,
|
|
|
- // since the other node in the cluster would have taken ACTIVE.
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(0, ActiveStandbyElector.State.STANDBY);
|
|
|
- long et2 = Time.now();
|
|
|
- assertTrue("Should take ~3 seconds to rejoin. Only took " + (et2 - et) +
|
|
|
- "ms before rejoining.",
|
|
|
- et2 - et > 2800);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ DummyZKFC zkfc = cluster.getZkfc(0);
|
|
|
+ // It should be in active to start.
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(ActiveStandbyElector.State.ACTIVE,
|
|
|
+ zkfc.getElectorForTests().getStateForTests());
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Ask it to cede active for 3 seconds. It should respond promptly
|
|
|
+ // (i.e. the RPC itself should not take 3 seconds!)
|
|
|
+ ZKFCProtocol proxy = zkfc.getLocalTarget().getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000);
|
|
|
+ long st = Time.now();
|
|
|
+ proxy.cedeActive(3000);
|
|
|
+ long et = Time.now();
|
|
|
+ assertTrue("RPC to cedeActive took " + (et - st) + " ms",
|
|
|
+ et - st < 1000);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Should be in "INIT" state since it's not in the election
|
|
|
+ // at this point.
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(ActiveStandbyElector.State.INIT,
|
|
|
+ zkfc.getElectorForTests().getStateForTests());
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // After the prescribed 3 seconds, should go into STANDBY state,
|
|
|
+ // since the other node in the cluster would have taken ACTIVE.
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(0, ActiveStandbyElector.State.STANDBY);
|
|
|
+ long et2 = Time.now();
|
|
|
+ assertTrue("Should take ~3 seconds to rejoin. Only took " + (et2 - et) +
|
|
|
+ "ms before rejoining.",
|
|
|
+ et2 - et > 2800);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=25000)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailover() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(1);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(0).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(0).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Thread.sleep(10000); // allow to quiesce
|
|
|
+ Thread.sleep(10000); // allow to quiesce
|
|
|
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(2, cluster.getService(0).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(1).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(2, cluster.getService(0).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(1).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailoverToUnhealthy() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // Mark it unhealthy, wait for it to exit election
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(1, false);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForElectorState(1, ActiveStandbyElector.State.INIT);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ask for failover, it should fail, because it's unhealthy
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- fail("Did not fail to graceful failover to unhealthy service!");
|
|
|
- } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
- GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).toString() +
|
|
|
- " is not currently healthy.", sfe);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
+ // Mark it unhealthy, wait for it to exit election
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(1, false);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForElectorState(1, ActiveStandbyElector.State.INIT);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Ask for failover, it should fail, because it's unhealthy
|
|
|
+ try {
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ fail("Did not fail to graceful failover to unhealthy service!");
|
|
|
+ } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
+ GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).toString() +
|
|
|
+ " is not currently healthy.", sfe);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailoverFailBecomingActive() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
- cluster.setFailToBecomeActive(1, true);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ask for failover, it should fail and report back to user.
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- fail("Did not fail to graceful failover when target failed " +
|
|
|
- "to become active!");
|
|
|
- } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
- GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
- "Couldn't make " + cluster.getService(1) + " active", sfe);
|
|
|
- GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
- "injected failure", sfe);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // No fencing
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setFailToBecomeActive(1, true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // Service 0 should go back to being active after the failed failover
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
+ // Ask for failover, it should fail and report back to user.
|
|
|
+ try {
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ fail("Did not fail to graceful failover when target failed " +
|
|
|
+ "to become active!");
|
|
|
+ } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
+ GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
+ "Couldn't make " + cluster.getService(1) + " active", sfe);
|
|
|
+ GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
+ "injected failure", sfe);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // No fencing
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Service 0 should go back to being active after the failed failover
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailoverFailBecomingStandby() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ask for failover when old node fails to transition to standby.
|
|
|
- // This should trigger fencing, since the cedeActive() command
|
|
|
- // still works, but leaves the breadcrumb in place.
|
|
|
- cluster.setFailToBecomeStandby(0, true);
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // Check that the old node was fenced
|
|
|
- assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Ask for failover when old node fails to transition to standby.
|
|
|
+ // This should trigger fencing, since the cedeActive() command
|
|
|
+ // still works, but leaves the breadcrumb in place.
|
|
|
+ cluster.setFailToBecomeStandby(0, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Check that the old node was fenced
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=15000)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailoverFailBecomingStandbyAndFailFence()
|
|
|
- throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
+ throws Exception {
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Ask for failover when old node fails to transition to standby.
|
|
|
- // This should trigger fencing, since the cedeActive() command
|
|
|
- // still works, but leaves the breadcrumb in place.
|
|
|
- cluster.setFailToBecomeStandby(0, true);
|
|
|
- cluster.setFailToFence(0, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- fail("Failover should have failed when old node wont fence");
|
|
|
- } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
- GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
- "Unable to fence " + cluster.getService(0), sfe);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
+ // Ask for failover when old node fails to transition to standby.
|
|
|
+ // This should trigger fencing, since the cedeActive() command
|
|
|
+ // still works, but leaves the breadcrumb in place.
|
|
|
+ cluster.setFailToBecomeStandby(0, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setFailToFence(0, true);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ try {
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ fail("Failover should have failed when old node wont fence");
|
|
|
+ } catch (ServiceFailedException sfe) {
|
|
|
+ GenericTestUtils.assertExceptionContains(
|
|
|
+ "Unable to fence " + cluster.getService(0), sfe);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -568,73 +539,65 @@ public class TestZKFailoverController extends ClientBaseWithFixes {
|
|
|
* Test which exercises all of the inputs into ZKFC. This is particularly
|
|
|
* useful for running under jcarder to check for lock order violations.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout=30000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testOneOfEverything() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start();
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Failover by session expiration
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Failing over by session expiration");
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
- cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Restart ZK
|
|
|
- LOG.info("====== Restarting server");
|
|
|
- stopServer();
|
|
|
- waitForServerDown(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
- startServer();
|
|
|
- waitForServerUp(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Failover by bad health
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(1, true);
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
- cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForHealthState(0, State.SERVICE_HEALTHY);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- // Graceful failovers
|
|
|
- cluster.getZkfc(1).gracefulFailoverToYou();
|
|
|
- cluster.getZkfc(0).gracefulFailoverToYou();
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ cluster.start();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Failover by session expiration
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Failing over by session expiration");
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(0, 1);
|
|
|
+ cluster.expireAndVerifyFailover(1, 0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Restart ZK
|
|
|
+ LOG.info("====== Restarting server");
|
|
|
+ stopServer();
|
|
|
+ waitForServerDown(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
+ startServer();
|
|
|
+ waitForServerUp(hostPort, CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Failover by bad health
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(1, true);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, false);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(1, HAServiceState.ACTIVE);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHAState(0, HAServiceState.INITIALIZING);
|
|
|
+ cluster.setHealthy(0, true);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForHealthState(0, State.SERVICE_HEALTHY);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ // Graceful failovers
|
|
|
+ cluster.getZkfc(1).gracefulFailoverToYou();
|
|
|
+ cluster.getZkfc(0).gracefulFailoverToYou();
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- @Test(timeout = 25000)
|
|
|
+ @Test
|
|
|
public void testGracefulFailoverMultipleZKfcs() throws Exception {
|
|
|
- try {
|
|
|
- cluster.start(3);
|
|
|
+ cluster.start(3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // failover to first
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(1);
|
|
|
+ // failover to first
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(1).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // failover to second
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(2).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(2);
|
|
|
+ // failover to second
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(2).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // failover back to original
|
|
|
- cluster.getService(0).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
- cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
+ // failover back to original
|
|
|
+ cluster.getService(0).getZKFCProxy(conf, 5000).gracefulFailover();
|
|
|
+ cluster.waitForActiveLockHolder(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Thread.sleep(10000); // allow to quiesce
|
|
|
+ Thread.sleep(10000); // allow to quiesce
|
|
|
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(2).fenceCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(2, cluster.getService(0).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(1).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
- assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(2).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
- } finally {
|
|
|
- cluster.stop();
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(0).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(1).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(0, cluster.getService(2).fenceCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(2, cluster.getService(0).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(1).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
+ assertEquals(1, cluster.getService(2).activeTransitionCount);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
private int runFC(DummyHAService target, String ... args) throws Exception {
|